[This
was published in Dhaka Courier on 14 June 2013]
During
a holiday some of the closest friends, old and new, gathered at the house of
Mr. Samad, an engineer, at his invitation. Samad is known to all as one of the
most dynamic; friendly and hospitable personalities since the very days of
student life. He is still a bridge between or among the friends. From such
standpoints, almost everybody turned up there to make it a grand success.
Therefore, it was without a doubt a rarest occasion full of thrills, cheers and
recollections. Some met after a long while other found opportunities to renew
the old relations. They after a while got engrossed in gossips on many a topic,
relevant or irrelevant, ranging from personal to professional to social to
economic to religious to political to come what may not in a very staid mood and fashion.
During
the discussions Dr. Jalal, a professor of philosophy, threw an open question
adding ‘what is truth?’ Professor Mujibur, a political scientist, instantly replied
‘Truth is beauty’. What is beauty?’ asked another friend Mr. Aziz, a publisher,
‘It’s very simple without doubt because everybody knows that beauty is truth’. Another
friend Mr. Tapan, a business executive in a multi-national company, said ‘Truth
is what it appears to be’. ‘No, I differ with both of you because truth can
hardly be defined in such simple words. It’s an atomic concept, which swells in
the context of its unfolding manifestation. Truth must be tagged with religion
in the end’ refuted Mr. Jassim, a Professor of Comparative Religions. ‘Aren’t
all these befooling to the highest order as they tend to pave the way for more
philosophical penetration breeding number of loopholes necessarily or
unnecessarily? noted Mr. Junaid, a
literary personality . ‘Well, let us take a choice that today we will not walk
behind such philosophical jargons, which will merely snatch away our valuable
time, energy and stock’ opined Mr. Kasem, a lawyer. Therefore, everybody hailed
it as a wise conclusion.
When
all these were going on, Mr. Rahman, an architect, was in the very deep of contemplation
as if he were lost in the world of a new horizon. Mr. Yakub, a pharmacist, gave
him a big jerk and he came to sense within a second posing a question “who did
cause a havoc to me by pulling me down from the land of hopes and aspirations?
All attentions were focused on him making a meaningful query in a body ‘what’s
wrong in you?’ ‘Yes, I was thinking with utmost effort and patience what
justice is in today’s context?’ responded Mr. Rahman in a calm and confident
disposition.
‘Very
interesting indeed’ one and all voiced in the same tune and tone.
‘Would
you kindly explain what the upshot you have been carrying?’ asked Safi, a
politician. ‘In fact, I understand that justice denotes in today’s perspective
what the person concerned defines and sticks to’ said Mr. Rahman. ‘All these
are bull sheets. I am convinced enough that that you are still in an atmosphere
of hallucination’ retorted Mr. Ahmed, a journalist. ‘Do not misunderstand me
emotionally and arrogantly because I am just applying the Bush policy that
during the US-initiated multi-national war against Iraq under Saddam Husain
made it clear that the definition of terrorism meant what US meant and
asserted. Whoever dared to challenge such definition and stand under US
leadership should instantly be treated as enemy of terrorism. Here President Bush
did not allow thinking otherwise. You may call it chauvinistically
imperialistic approach to terrorism. Today justice cannot be dispensed freely
without having been retarded by many a factor and force from within and
without. Usually it goes in favor of the powerful and there is a little chance
for a balance to lean towards the powerless (the less fortunate and the poor).
That’s why, better option needs to be made also for the poor, backward and less
fortunate for which I wanted to include all, powerful and powerless. Hence, arises
my definition---what the person concerned defines and sticks to. It has two
advantages (a) it de-capitalize the concept and (b) it encompasses both the
powerful and the powerless. Here justice is viewed as saleable commodity where
the person(s) concerned shall play vital role in determining everything
depending upon its nature, quality and necessity’, told Mr. Rahman.
‘There
is no denying the fact that my friend Rahman has not only distorted the very
meaning and sanctity of justice but also made daring attempt to envelop it with
the mark of commodity. There might have some wrongs in dealing with justice but
that does not mean that justice is not dispended with proper care and
attention. When we say that justice is a kind of commodity we then go back to
the world where men are poor, brutish and helpless. World is still fair and
safe enough to live in. From the time immemorial human intellectualism and
fairness have been quite faithful to the connotation of justice from the standpoints
of its spirit and appeal. Therefore, let there be no ambiguity about the
highness and supremacy of justice being above a kind of commodity’ roared Mr.
Nasiruddin, a sociologist.
Mr.
Shamim Ahsan, a civil society leader who has meanwhile set himself as one of
the most acceptable, accommodative personalities in almost all domains, came
forward with his loud voice backed by strong logic and mathematics stating ‘We
are then again setting aside our choice line not to dwell upon any serious
topic like justice, truth and so on at this auspicious hour of life. These are
the areas where adequate time, energy and studies are needed if a free and
sincere discussion is encouraged. Amateurship is good but it should have its
limits. Settled issues should not be made unsettled in the manner you people
are trying to. All of you are qualified in the respective disciplines but the
general appeal and necessity of truth and justice shall never die under any
circumstances. I thank you all for your interest in such issues but I request
you all not to move merely with isolated, self-motivated interpretations. Truth
and justice are not matters to be enslaved. They are light upon light, vision
and mission upon vision and mission, starting from micro to macro levels.
Here
few sayings as follows are unavoidable indeed:
“The
truth is rarely pure and never simple (Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being
Ernest)’
“The truth." Dumbledore sighed. "It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution (J.K.Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone)”
“The truth." Dumbledore sighed. "It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution (J.K.Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone)”
‘Tell all the Truth but tell it slant--
Success in Circuit lies
Too bright for our infirm Delight
The Truth's superb surprise (Emily Dickinson, Tell all the Truth but tell it slant--)’
‘Justice is a concept of moral
rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, equity or
fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the
inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens, the right of
all people ad individuals to equal protection before the law pf their civil
rights without discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ,sexual
orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion,
disability, age, or other characteristics, ad is further regarded as being
inclusive of social justice(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice’
“Justice is
conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of
humanity" Alexander Solzhenitsyn
“Things go wrong in life. Justice is not done, and people
sort of get used to it" Patricia High
smith
“In England,
justice is open to all - like the Ritz Hotel" James Mathew
“Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and
undoubtedly be seen to be done" Lord
Hewart
"For
me, justice is the first condition of humanity" Wole Soyinka
‘The
quality or fact of being just’.
‘The
principle of fairness that like cases should be treated alike’.
‘A
particular distribution of benefits and burdens fairly in accordance with a
particular conception of what are to count as like cases’.
‘The
principle that punishment should be proportionate to the offence’. (http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/justice)
Therefore,
dear friends, let us open a chapter in the field of humors and jokes touched befittingly
with wits, intelligence and prudence ’. Thus, shortly a stream of delightedness
and excitement began to flow making the gathering a really enjoyable one.
No comments:
Post a Comment